The different faces can come with different understandings and explanations of the truth thus making it tricky for the listeners or any recipient of the truth. I just appreciate that in many cases, the gist of multiple explanations is consistent.
I second because, I believe truth is different from perception, perception can be tainted but truth cannot. My definition of truth is - "a quality or state of being which is in accord with reality – and such a definition does not include an individual human being’s perception of reality. Rather, something that is true – that is, exists in a state of being true or in accord with reality – is so independent of any human perception. It exits in purely objective fact."
The different faces can come with different understandings and explanations of the truth thus making it tricky for the listeners or any recipient of the truth. I just appreciate that in many cases, the gist of multiple explanations is consistent.
I second because, I believe truth is different from perception, perception can be tainted but truth cannot. My definition of truth is - "a quality or state of being which is in accord with reality – and such a definition does not include an individual human being’s perception of reality. Rather, something that is true – that is, exists in a state of being true or in accord with reality – is so independent of any human perception. It exits in purely objective fact."